If I can only have one film emulsion, let it be Kodachrome (25, 64, or 200). If I can't have Kodachrome, let my images have that Kodachrome aesthetic.
Ideas, Comments, Exaggerations & Delusions, Inspirations, and Secrets. Shoot what it feels like, not what it looks like. Seeing my world through Sony gear, finding Heaven everywhere. Check out my website/links below.
Showing posts with label Kodachrome. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kodachrome. Show all posts
Saturday, January 18, 2025
Wednesday, January 8, 2025
My take on the Film-Look
Film Simulation: the process of obtaining the film-look from images obtained by digital means.
There are two kinds of film-looks: the cheap-lens look and the expensive-lens look.
The cheap-lens look can be found in old family albums, pre-2000 snapshots. Typically, these photos were taken with consumer cameras with plastic lenses, using film of varying quality, film-processed in chemical soups in different states of freshness, in thousands of developing labs where film-processing protocol weren't always followed. Finally, cameras were used with primitive focusing systems. So-called auto settings were imprecise, let alone accurate. A decent lens inaccurately focused is a lousy lens.
Finally, to fully realize the cheap-lens aesthetic, shoot scenes with total disregard for the rules of composition, shoot into the light, shoot on Auto setting, etc. or all of the above. With or not-with a cheap lens.
The following photos were taken with a 2008 Canon G11, 1/1.7" sensor, 28-140 F2.8-4.5 lens, processesd to look like film snapshots. I tried to get away from conventional rules of composition, with little success.
The expensive-lens look is what is found in publications and photo exhibitions. The tools used were (traditionally) not accessible to the average consumers. Professional films had a narrow exposure latitude, which necessitated accurate metering. Lenses were colour corrected and sharp (read: expensive). Films went to Labs with precise processing. For example, Steve McCurry used Kodachrome that could only be processed in a handful of labs in the United States.
The following photos were taken with a Sony ZV-1 with it's 1" sensor and a very sharp 24-70 F1.8-2.8, processed to look like Kodachrome 64. I used the ZV-1 because it produces detail that looks like film grain.
And two honorable mentions, taken with a Sony A7III
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
POPULAR POSTS
-
Well, it's not really. The signage is changed on a regular basis by the owner of this establishment who fixes washers and dryers. T...
-
Kamal and Lamis' wedding on June 30th, in London, ON. This is the first wedding in years that I have attended as a guest. Througho...
-
a65 (a77 would be too big for this setup), HVLF43AM Flash (the 58AM would be too big for this setup), ThinkTank's CB Junior bracke...
-
I came across this blog by a collection of inveterate aficionados of broken umbrellas. They also welcome submissions from the umbrellarazzi...
-
It's been an intense relationship and it will soon be over. It's not the Oly, (here's goes the proverbial...) it's me. A mon...
-
http://bostonreview.net/BR36.3/junot_diaz_apocalypse_haiti_earthquake.php Pulitzer Prize winner Junot Diaz, in the May-June 2011 Boston Revi...
-
by Mary, of non-Filipina heritage, using a cookbook recipe for adobo . March 23rd. Recipe by www.pepper.ph . In addition to the recipe,...
-
There has never been a free lunch with high ISO's. Using high ISOs (ISO1600 and higher) meant putting up with noise/grain, colour shift...















