Showing posts with label SOOC JPGS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOOC JPGS. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 18, 2026

RAW (proceesed in Camera RAW) and SOOC JPG, Nikon D700

First photo is the straight-out-of-camera (SOOC) JPG, second photo is from the RAW version, processed in Camera RAW (adjustments for exposure, highlights, and shadows for all, except for the last image, where I reduced the yellow cast).

difference: darker shadows
difference: higher contrast
difference: more vibrance in the reds
diggerence: more vibrance in the shadows
difference: none
differnce: darker, overall
difference: darker overall, lower highlights
difference: lifted detail in the shadows
difference:brighter highlights
difference: deeper shadows
difference: darker, more contrast
difference: cleaner whites
I processed the RAW files to my liking, ending up with files that were really only lighter/darker/contrastier than the SOOC JPG files. It would seem that  SOOC JPGS from the Nikon D700 are useable straight out of the camera, setnng the EV comp to -0.3, colour profile to VIVID, and in general, exposing to avoid clipping the highlights.

Thursday, March 26, 2020

Luminar 4 Update

I bought Luminar 4 for its Portrait capabilities but just this week, I started using it for landscapes shot in my backyard and around my neighbourhood.
In a word: AWESOME! If you are on Instagram and you search for #luminar, you'll find some amazing photos.
Here's a Before and After using 5% Photoshop and 95% Luminar. The Before is a SOOC JPG, AWB, using an APS-C Sony A77II and a 25 year-old Minolta 70-210 F4 (the Beercan), It was overcast and the fog was just lifting off. I had gone out hoping to shoot a pair of mallards that visit the seasonal pond in the woods behind the house, as it is their annual thing to do. I didn't see them so I shot this scene, more as a record and not really hoping for any print-worthy images. If I had expected potentially amazing scenes, I would have used my Sony A7III and the far sharper Tamron 70-200 F2.8.
There is a plethora of imaging software out there, almost all doing the same things. I typically use Camera RAW in Adobe Photoshop. Based on my initial use, I find Luminar 4 to have more specific tools with more nuanced controls. For example, for this set, the Gradient Tool, and Dehaze to reduce the fog/mist, is superior to anything else that I have tried.
Based on this exercise, Luminar 4 seems to offer the possibility of getting more out of my SOOC JPGS, for maximum results. I can't wait to revisit the Olympus JPGS that I have from a Philippine trip 12 years ago. I had to use Photomatix HDR to get the best out of those files.
26Mar2020

POPULAR POSTS